NAMAH
Collective bio-energetics: food detoxification — I

Collective bio-energetics: food detoxification — I

By Joachim P. Seckel

Contributor

Volume 24, Issue 4Jan 15, 20174 min

Utilising a form of Applied Kinesiology by muscle-testing, the study focused on three food toxicity factors — Pesticide, Food additives, and Food colouring matter (PAC) — as detected for eight types of foods available at a supermarket in northern California. The market is located in the vicinity of a fitness centre for which an Integral Bio-Energetic Field (IBEF) had previously been established. Each of the PAC factors was later on selectively induced into the IBEF centre, thereby expanding its bio-energetic potential for detoxification. Subsequent post-testing indicated that exposure of the food samples to IBEF led to their detoxification involving the three PAC factors.

Collective bio-energetics: food detoxification — I

The investigation may be considered being sequential to a prior study regarding the bio-energetic detection and detoxification of air-pollution, as detailed in the April 2016 issue of NAMAH (1). The current investigation represents the first of two studies concerning food toxicity — its initial detection, and elimination after exposure of the food samples to an Integral Bio-Energetic Field, known as IBEF. The detoxification is believed to be due to the vibration emanating from the energy field. The IBEF had earlier been created (induced) and verified as existing at a local fitness centre (2). Basic methods used for creating and activating IBEF are summarised below in the Appendix.

The investigation covers several areas of interest, as follows: 1. Baseline indicators showing three toxicity factors within food samples in trace amounts; 2. Selective induction of these factors into an IBEF centre; and 3. the resulting detoxification.

Baseline measures

At the outset, baseline measures revealed trace amounts of toxicity contained in eight types of foods available at a local supermarket, located in the vicinity of the initial IBEF centre. The three toxicity factors were: Pesticide, Food additives, and Food colouring matter (PAC). The inorganic food samples included banana, onion, tomato, bell pepper, potato, ginger-root, mushroom as well as  mixed frozen vegetables (carrots, peas, beans) for which trace food colouring was detected.

The PAC factors were detected by applying a form of Applied Kinesiology, referred to as Pre-Determined Muscle Testing (PDM), (3). The testing involved several steps: 1) the recipient continually holding the food sample; and 2) also, holding, successively, three water-filled vials, each of which had been electronically sensitized for a different PAC factor; 3) the investigator PDM-testing the recipient — pressing on his/her (right or left) down-turned wrist, arm extended, while he/she gently resists the pressure. A relatively ‘strong’ muscle indicates a non-allergic condition; whereas, a “weak” muscle indicates an allergic reaction — to a specified PAC toxicity factor.

It should be emphasised that the baseline samples had been obtained from a supermarket nearby the IBEF centre. According to prior studies, IBEF effects are ordinarily limited to a centre’s immediate vicinity. However, a special procedure can be applied so as to extend IBEF effects within 5-mile radius (4).

Selective induction

Initial baseline data were obtained prior to the application of a selective induction procedure.

At this point, clarification is needed with regard to two types of bio-energetic inductions.

The first of these is overall induction. It involves a combination of seven core elements to produce a complex vial for creating IBEF. The second type is selective induction. It serves to expand the overall scope of IBEF, in order to provide specific kinds of healing, allergy clearance, and detoxification.

Induction of PAC toxicity

After the baseline testing, the three PAC toxicity factors were selectively induced into the IBEF centre, as verified with pre-post PDM testing. Stated briefly, the procedure consists of three steps. First, I ask the Divine Mother for guidance to enable the procedure. Next, I hold the complex vial which was used to create IBEF together, successively, with each of the three PAC vials. Then, I visualise myself using gentle acupressure, as follows: with the index fingers on both sides between the vertebrae, press once down the 12 thoracic and 5 lumbar vertebrae.

By performing this step for each of the PAC vials, the three PAC substances will have been induced into the IBEF centre.

Each factor was tested twice: before the induction, showing that it was not present within the IBEF centre; and again after the induction, verifying its presence within the centre.

The testing was done first by the investigator; next, as ‘blind-testing’, by an assistant, Allison, a staff-member at the fitness centre where IBEF had initially been established.

Detoxification effect

Following the selective induction, PDM was repeated as post-testing for each of the eight food samples, for which earlier baseline testing had shown trace toxicity.

The post-testing indicated that each of the three PAC toxicity factors had been eliminated, were no longer detectable. Presumably, after the selective induction, IBEF dynamics served to synthesize and integrate the PAC factors, resulting in their detoxification.

The above findings support the study’s central hypothesis: namely, that the IBEF vibrations led to the detoxification of PAC. From a viewpoint of the Integral Yoga, however, a higher form of energy may have emanated and brought about the result, which is beyond ordinary scientific explanation. From this perspective, the detoxification effects are believed to be within the realm of the Divine Mother’s Grace, brought about with her compassion and guidance.

References

1. Seckel JP. Collective bio-energetic detoxification. NAMAH, April 2016; 24(1): 46-8.

2. Seckel JP. Creating a healing atmosphere within centres and for a spiritual community: an investigative study — II, NAMAH, July 2015; 23(2): 26-34.

3. Nambudripad DS. Freedom from Environmental Sensitivities. Buena Park, CA: Delta Publishing Company; 2005, pp. 150-3.

4. Seckel JP. Creating a healing atmosphere within centres and for a spiritual community: an investigative study – III, NAMAH, October 2015; 23(3): 38.

5. Allergies, Lifestyle & Health [Online] Available from: http://www.alhvials.com (Accessed 11th July, 2016).

6. Seckel JP. Creating a healing atmosphere within centres and for a spiritual community: an investigative study — I, NAMAH, April 2015; 23(1): 25-6.

7. Seckel JP. Creating a healing atmosphere within centres and for a spiritual community: an investigative study — II, NAMAH, July 2015; 23(2): 29-30.

Appendix

IBEF dynamics

In order to create, sustain, and verify IBEF at a centre, several preparatory phases are required, as summarised below. More detailed aspects are described in prior NAMAH articles (1), (2), (4).

1. Divine guidance

In the spirit of Integral Yoga, we ask the Divine Mother for guidance and Grace toward creating the IBEF healing atmosphere. As a devotee of the Integral Yoga of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, the practitioner would be an aspirant towards a higher consciousness and familiar with and dedicated to their teachings.

2. PDM and QRT testing

To create IBEF, detect its presence and verify the effects, Pre-Determined Muscle Testing (PDM), as explained above, is mainly applied.

In addition, a form of self muscle-testing, referred to as Question-Response Testing, (QRT), may be utilised. It involves: a) asking a specific health-related question; b) receiving a relative muscle-strength answer in terms of ‘Yes’ (strong) or ‘No’ (weak). For a frequently used QRT: press tip of middle-finger upon the index finger’s upper finger-nail, thereby, determining relative muscle strength.

3. NAET: Allergy elimination

Applying principles of oriental medicine, NAET (Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique) is not only a method for detecting and clearing allergies. Its scope is broader than the medical definition of allergies — as it is based on measures of reactivity to bio-incompatible substances and related types of energetic imbalance. Thus, its PDM-testing includes reactivity to pathogens, toxic elements, body components, as well as allergic response to another person.

The basic NAET procedure involves a series of PDM muscle tests. Throughout these steps, the patient holds a water-filled vial which has been electronically sensitized for a given substance, or potential allergen. Using PDM, the practitioner determines whether or not the patient is allergic to the designated vial substance. The subsequent treatment, mainly, applies configurations of acupressure points along the patient’s thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.

Maj