Divided into two sub-studies, the investigation examined: a. baseline indicators of differential toxicity for organic versus inorganic food samples, with the latter showing an initial degree of toxicity; and b) potential for detoxification of the inorganic sample, following exposure to an Integral Bio-Energetic Field, known as IBEF. Major features of the two sub-studies are set forth herewith.
Basic aspects for two sub-studies
At the outset, several aspects involving the two sub-studies need to be clarified, namely: 1. PDM-testing for degree of toxicity; 2. specific food samples tested for both studies; and 3. the IBEF energy field, exposure to which brought about a degree of detoxification for the inorganic samples.
1. PDM testing
For both sub-studies, data indicators were based on a form of Applied Kinesiology, referred to as PDM, or Pre-Determined Muscle Testing (1). The testing involves a recipient holding separately each food item of the organic sample, followed by holding the corresponding inorganic food item. Steps for the PDM-testing, as well as an alternate form of testing, known as Question-Response Testing (QRT), are described in Appendix 2.
2. Food samples
As mentioned above, both sub-studies utilised PDM-testing for the organic vs. inorganic sets of food samples. The samples included seven food items: an apple, carrot, bell-pepper, potato, ginger-root, onion, and mushroom. Each item was PDM-tested, at pre-post intervals, ie. before and after IBEF exposure.
3. IBEF energy field
An energy field referred to as Integral Bio-Energetic Field (IBEF) had previously been created, sustained, and verified at a local fitness centre in northern California. Designed to promote healing and wellness, the energy field also has been shown to facilitate food detoxification.
Stages for the development and creation of IBEF are reviewed in Appendices 3-7. More detailed aspects were described in a prior NAMAH article (2).
In order to create IBEF, a multi-dimensional vial had first to be generated — it was accomplished by an organisation specialising in these services, Allergies Life-Style & Health Company (ALH) (3). As a complex component, the IBEF vial incorporates a combination of eight core-elements. These were initially identified by the investigator, using Question-Response-Testing (QRT); its procedure is described in Appendix 2.
Examples of the vial’s core-elements include such dimensions as:
1. Bringing about and maintaining a harmonious Brain-Body Field (BBF) — a balanced flow between mental, emotional, and physical energy bodies;
2. Eliminating allergies, involving reactivity to any bio-incompatible substance;
3. Removing excess toxicity, as needed, in the physical body;
4. Dispelling pathogens, including any bacteria, virus, fungus or parasites.
The IBEF vial, consisting of the eight core-elements, was next induced into the fitness centre. It was accomplished with an application of the Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique (NAET) — designed to clear/eliminate allergies linked to bio-incompatible substances or conditions. Major aspects of NAET are summarised in Appendix 3.
Two characteristics of IBEF’s energy field may be pointed out, as shown by prior studies (4). First, it was found that IBEF becomes inactive after a one-month period — thereby requiring a reset for re-activation. The reset procedure is described in Appendix 6.
Second, it has been demonstrated that IBEF’s energy field can extend up to about a 5-mile radius from the IBEF centre. However, a simple procedure is required to facilitate the extension, as summarised in Appendix 7.
Initial sub-study
The first sub-study focused on two food samples, consisting of organic and inorganic items — bought at a supermarket within the vicinity of the IBEF centre. The food samples were obtained during the period while a reset for IBEF was required, i.e., its energy field remained inactive.
During this inactive period, PDM-testing of the two food samples disclosed a differential between them. Namely, the organic foods showed no degree of toxicity (non-reactive/strong), whereas the inorganic foods manifested a slight degree of toxicity (reactive/weak). The latter toxicity may be attributed to trace amounts of pesticide, as indicated by PDM-testing with a vial sensitized for pesticide.
Prior to the study’s next stage, a reset procedure was applied — as a result, IBEF’s energy field became re-activated.
Thereafter, the above PDM-testing was repeated. This time, the PDM results showed no differential between the organic and inorganic food samples, i.e., there was no measurable degree of toxicity for either food set. Presumably, the inorganic food sample was, in effect, detoxified subsequent to its exposure to the IBEF energy field.
For additional verification on two occasions, the investigator randomly PDM-tested a wide variety other than the samples specified above — of organic vs. inorganic food items at the same supermarket. During his first visit, IBEF required a reset, i.e., was inactive. PDM-testing at that time revealed again differentials between the two food samples, the inorganic foods showing a slight degree of toxicity, due to trace amounts of pesticide. By the time of the second visit, the IBEF reset had been accomplished. Thereupon, the differential obtained with PDM-testing for the two food sets was no longer evident – the inorganic food sample did not indicate a degree of toxicity.
Second sub-study
The second sub-study again focused on the above two types of organic and inorganic food samples; however, these food sets were bought at a supermarket located over 5 miles distant from the IBEF centre, i.e., beyond its extended IBEF energy field.
To obtain baseline data, the two food samples were initially PDM-tested at the distant supermarket. As found above, the organic food items were non-toxic, whereas the inorganic foods revealed a slight degree of toxicity, due to trace amounts of pesticide.
For the next stage, the two sets were brought within the vicinity of the IBEF centre, and again PDM-tested. This time, the testing indicated non-toxicity for both the organic and inorganic food samples.
The two sub-studies can be said to confirm IBEF’s detoxification effect, involving the inorganic food samples. It would appear that IBEF’s vibration field, with its eight core elements, brought about the effect. On a higher level, I presume that the detoxification dynamics for both sub-studies manifested within the realm of the Integral Yoga, as enabled by the Grace of the Divine Mother.
